You are here: Home > What we do > Licensing & Permitting > Integrated Pollution Prevention Control > Licensing Process Explained

Also in this section

Submissions   |   Oral Hearings   |   Objections   |   

The licensing process explained

When applying to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for an IPPC licence, you must satisfy a number of legislative requirements. These are largely set out in:

  • The EPA (Licensing) Regulations, 1994 (S.I. No. 85 of 1994) and
  • Amendments SI 76 of 1995, SI 240 of 1996, 394 of 2004 and, SI 382 of 2008.

The application process involves a number of stages:

Stage 1: Pre-application

Before making an application you must:

  • Publish a notice in a newspaper circulating in the area,
  • Erect a notice on the site indicating that you propose to apply for a licence
  • Notify the planning authority

The content of the notices is set out in the EPA (Licensing) Regulations, 1994 (S.I. No. 85 of 1994)

Stage 2: Making an application

This stage includes EPA assessment of the the application and submissions on the application. In making an application, make sure that:

  • You use the specified application form (Guidance Notes are available - see below)
  • You answer all questions (incomplete applications may be returned)
  • You pay special attention to the relevant BAT Guidance Note(s), if available at that time from the EPA
  • You attach all necessary supporting documentation including the relevant fee.

We have eight weeks to assess your application before making a "proposed determination".

The eight-week period only starts when the necessary request(s) have been complied with. This period may be extended in certain circumstances, including by agreement with the applicant/licensee.

Before making a proposed determination we must take into account any written submissions received.  

Stage 3: EPA proposed determination

We are required to indicate how we propose to determine an application, and will:

  • Publish a newspaper notice indicating how we propose to determine the application
  • Forward the proposed determination to all those who made a submission
  • Make the proposed determination available for public inspection on this website
  • Notify public bodies specifed in the above mentioned regulations

Stage 4: Any objections on the proposed determination (including submissions on objections)

Any person or body (including the applicant for a licence or a licensee) can make an objection within 28 days of the proposed determination being issued.

The applicant and those submitting a valid objection will be issued with a copy of all valid objections. Submissions in relation to an objection can be made within one month of copies of the objection being circulated.

We cannot consider submissions on objections received after this one-month period, and cannot consider further submissions or elaborations.

We do, however, have the discretion, in the interests of justice and where in particular circumstances we consider appropriate, to request a party to an objection to make a submission in relation to any matter arising in the course of the objection.

Where appropriate, we may request a party to an objection to submit further information within a specified period.

Where no valid objection is made within the prescribed period, we will issue our decision as per the Proposed Determination.

Stage 5: Oral hearing

A person making a valid objection may request an oral hearing. 

Stage 6: Our Final determination

In arriving at our decision, we will consider the application and all objections, submissions received and, where an oral hearing has been held, the report and recommendation of the person/s who conducted the hearing.

When a final determination (decision) has been made, we will notify:

  • The applicant/licensee
  • Anyone who made a written submission in relation to the application
  • Anyone who made a valid objection
  • Public bodies specifed in the regulations

The decision will be made available for inspection on this website and published in a newspaper circulating in the area. Waivers and refunds for applications and objections of the fees may be allowed in certain limited circumstances.

Once a Decision has issued, a person can apply to the High Court and seek a judicial review of the validity of the Decision. Please see Stage 7 below. 

 

Stage 7: Judicial Review

What is a judicial review?
Judicial review is a form of court proceedings in which a judge reviews the lawfulness of a decision of action by a public body.  It is a challenge to the way in which a decision has been made. It is not so much concerned with the decision itself and whether it was right but with whether the law has been correctly applied and whether the correct procedures were followed. It is not an appeals process.  The court will not substitute its opinion for that of the public authority.

Whose decisions can be challenged by judicial review?
The types of public bodies whose decisions may be challenged include among others:
Government ministers and departments
Local authorities and health authorities
The Environmental Protection Agency

Who can apply for a judicial review?

A person who feels that a decision of  the Agency has violated his/her rights may apply to the High Court for a judicial review of the decision.

Time Limit

In accordance with Section 87(10) of the EPA Acts 1992, as amended, a person may institute proceedings within a period of 8 weeks beginning on the date the Agency issues its Decision.

What makes a decision unlawful?

Judicial review looks at the lawfulness of decisions and actions.  These can be challenged on a number of grounds which are often described as follows:
Illegality, Irrationality and Unfairness
Illegality: Public bodies must correctly understand and apply the law that regulates their decision making powers.  If the decision maker had no power to make it or exceeded the powers given to him/her/it an action or decision may be unlawful.
Irrationality:  The court can reverse a decision if it is so unreasonable as to be “perverse” or “irrational”
Unfairness:  This generally deals with the process by which a decision was reached and includes the right to a fair hearing

Remedies or what can a judicial review do for me?
If an application for a judicial review is successful, the court can grant a remedy by making one of a number of orders:

  1. Certiorari i.e. the Court may set aside or quash the unlawful act.  This is the most commonly requested remedy and it overturns an invalid decision that has already been made.
  2. Prohibition: i.e. the Court prohibits the public authority from taking an unlawful decision or action.
  3. Mandamus: or mandatory order This order compels the public authority to  perform a duty, either an action the body has a duty to perform or the duty to reach a discretionary decision
  4. Declarations: The Court may simply declare what the law is, or declare the respective rights of the parties without making any other order.

Proceedings

There are two stages in proceedings for a judicial review:
1. Leave to apply for a judicial review
2. Where leave is granted, the substantial application is heard.

Stage 8: Review of an existing licence

All requests from Licensees to carry out alterations or reconstruction works that effect emissions on site should be considered in the first instance by the Office of Environmental Enforcement.  If the Office of Environmental Enforcement is of the view that the works or measures cannot be accommodated within the terms of the existing Licence, the Licensee is notifed accordingly by the Office of Environmental Enforcement.

If a review is necessary, a formal request by the Licensee for a review of a Licence must be made in writing to the Environmental Licensing Programme of the Office of Climate, Licensing & Resource Use, in accordance with Article 15 of the EPA (Licensing) Regulations 1994 to 2008 and accompanied by the review request fee of €126 in accordance with the EPA (Licensing Fees) Regulations 1994 to 2006.  Such a request must state the grounds on which it is made.  Where the Agency accedes to the request, the Licensee must supply all the necessary documentation requested in accordance with Section 90 of the EPA Acts 1992 to 2011 and pay the required review fee.

Once the decision is made by the Agency to review a Licence, the review process follows the same general procedures as those for an application for a Licence.

The Agency can also initiate a review of a Licence in certain circumstances as outlined in Section 87(1)(b) of the EPA Acts 1992 to 2011.

Learn more

Find out more about:

For further information, contact our Environmental Licensing Programme at:

Office of Climate, Licensing & Resource Use
PO Box 3000
Johnstown Castle Estate
County Wexford
Telephone Locall 1890 33 55 99 or 053 91 60600
Email info@epa.ie for the attention of the Environmental Licensing Programme.